“I have complete religion in professionalism of the telecom operators. They are extremely skilled and really professional persons managing technological know-how and networks…These have been really disruptive situations, from multiple angles, but I feel the market leaders are capable more than enough to appear out (of) these disruptive situations,” Sharma advised .
While each and every sector has its share of “ups and downs” and “versions”, the telecom marketplace has steered by way of the disruptive interval for the duration of the pandemic, controlling not only the spike in demand but also changes in pattern of website traffic, as network hundreds shifted from enterprise premises to households, he stated.
“Unlike some other sectors, the telecom sector has not experienced from deficiency of need. It is shining and has an incredibly very good long run. Every person is managing it effectively, and it has a dazzling long run ahead,” explained Sharma, whose tenure at the helm of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) is slated to conclusion on September 30.
Competitive pricing will keep on in a no cost current market financial state, Sharma claimed although pointing out that cost-free market overall economy has also introduced significant gains like better efficiencies, superior companies and cost-efficient measures.
“I believe that the industry will take treatment of itself. If there is a cost-free participate in in the marketplace, we need to consider in the no cost industry process, and until there is a marketplace failure, one should not intervene,” he claimed.
Speaking in favour of “gentle-touch regulation”, Sharma claimed “unless of course there is a sector failure, 1 must not control unnecessarily.”
Sharma, whose term at the helm of TRAI has been marked by lots of far-achieving, at occasions contentious, conclusions, like that on cost-free introductory providers, points of interconnect, simply call join costs and net neutrality, asserted that the regulator taken care of an “definitely goal tactic” devoid of any bias.
At periods, its tips these types of as reduction of levies went down properly with all stakeholders, even though sure tips ended up opposed by a vast majority.
There ended up some choices that were being perceived to be harming specific gamers, although many others observed it as benefiting them, Sharma reported.
“When we just take a selection, we don’t make a prior assessment as to who will reward and who will not. We glance at no matter what is in the interest of the over-all targets set for TRAI and consider those people conclusions,” Sharma said.
A demanding and industry-wide consultation system preceded each conclusion designed by the regulator, he observed.
“Occasionally we get flak from these who are harmed, and aid from any individual who feels they have benefitted. At times men and women make this out as a bias or not biased strategy, which is a pretty unfair. Of system, we are individuals, so we may well make blunders…I am not saying we are great…But from our see, we consider choices which are reasonable,” he stated.